frank_davis4

frank_davis


Frank Davis

Banging on about the Smoking Ban


Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Junican's Victory Speech
frank_davis4
frank_davis
Junican's Victory Speech after winning (with, erm, a little help from his friends) a competition on the BMJ blog to come up with yet another seriously batshit crazy idea for Tobacco Control:


I thank you for the award of the prize of a subscription to 'Tobacco Control' magazine. I am much gratified, since the last thing that I won, without much effort, was an Easter egg when I was 17 years old.

Oh, by the way, there is a misconception in your above statement.

Your statement suggests that I have ‘colleagues in the pro-smoking lobby’. This is not true. I have no ‘colleagues’. I am merely a little, old man of 71 years caring for a little old lady of 69 years who has MS, whose occasional trip to our local pub has been ruined by the catastrophic effects on our pubs of the smoking ban, and I am merely a commenter on various blogs, on which ‘pro-freedom’ matters are discussed. I also have no significant political associations, or any other similar associations other than ‘signing up’ to newspapers and such in order to comment. I comment on many of these sites about a multitude of things.

Further, you say that my ‘colleagues’ on these blogs ‘tipped my idea over the top’. Erm.. 70% as opposed to the nearest, about 9%? Tipped over the top? No. There is a clear indication that your members, on the whole, are not interested and are probably not in agreement with your demonisation of smokers. Also, it may be that some other commenters on other blogs voted for my idea for fun, but it is also true, and something that you do not know, that a young man who is a relative of mine, put out the message to his friends on the internet to vote for my idea. They did not have to – they did it of their own accord. They did it because my relative suggested that they do. IS THIS AN ENORMOUS CONFOUNDER? Of course it is! In any study or survey, CONFOUNDERS can have an ENORMOUS effect.

Furthermore, at no time did I state my full name in your blog comments. In the BT phone directory there are only 20 ‘J Watson’ s in the area in which I live (which you must know since you have been trawling various blogs for information about me) and only one specifically named. I may well, therefore, receive an amount of nasty correspondence. Now, it may be that your employees receive nasty correspondence, BUT THEY ARE PAID A SALARY! I am not. You should not have published my full name. The fact that, in a different context on a different blog, I told people who I was is no excuse.

Furthermore, you say that my ‘idea’ was a good idea. It was not. Everyone with any sense knows that THE PROFITS of tobacco companies are spread all over the world among the shareholders, many of which are pension funds in the UK of the very organisations which promote Tobacco Control. Do the BMJ pension funds have investments in Tobacco Companies? Have the BMJ pension funds EVER had investments in Tobacco Companies? When did that cease to be the case, if it has?

As for the HEALTH COSTS (of the enjoyment of tobacco) in my idea, I can only say that the idea of ‘Health Costs’ is ephemeral. The complexities are too great for proper science to come to any definite conclusion. The complexities of a mere three constituents in Electromagnetic Effects are huge - only THREE multivariables, the electric current, the electric field and the magnetic field – and no one has really bottomed it. It is obvious from the recently issued ‘Report of the Surgeon General 2010 re Smoking and Health’ that there are HUNDREDS of multivariables in the human genome - just too many multivariables to draw any specific conclusions. This fact cannot be hidden by bluster.

Also, IT CANNOT BE TRUE that you knew about my little wind-ups (the ‘propaganda’ thing) before you chose my idea to be one of the six contenders for the prize. Not even tobacco control zealots could come up with any sensible or logical reason for choosing an idea from a person who is ‘a known colleague of people on pro-smoking blogs’ when there are others to choose from (no matter how silly they may be).

Finally, it simply is not true that I, as a person who enjoys tobacco, have ever, in all my life, harmed in any way or caused the death of any other person in whose presence I have enjoyed my tobacco. Where is your proof? (And don’t say Roy Castle, because it is well known that Roy (God Bless Him) smoked cigars).

Sincerely,

Jwatso (aka Junican).

nicked from the comments

  • 1

Victory Speech

(Anonymous)
Congratulations Junican and well done.

Well done junican......I get great satisfaction pissing off the nazis!

couldn't agree more, even if I tried!!!

Congratulations, Junican.

"the prize of a subscription to 'Tobacco Control' magazine."

Have you thought of a safe means of disposal yet?

I'm sure that we wouldn't want that to fall into the wrong hands.


Rose

Well done, treat yourself to a pint and a fag, but make sure you stand outside in the freezing cold, miles from anyone who may catch 10th hand smoke disease.

Beautiful piece of writing, Junican.

When you get your first issue of Tobacco Control magazine, let us all know if there's a full-page foldout featuring Carrie Nation, in all of her 6 foot/175 pound glory, with a hatchet and Bible strategically placed so as to lasciviously conceal her stunning BMI-perfect chassis.

Congratulations on your win Junico, the fact that you achieved 77% of the vote I think is highly significant, it belies the claim of ASH that over 80% of the population support the anti smoking legislation, it says that ASH, the Government, the BMA and the BMJ have got it all horribly wrong! A magnificent acheivement!

John Watson.

Hello Frank.

Here is a copy of a post that I have just made on DP's site:

""Needless to say, the BMJ have not published my 'gracious acceptance speech'.

Do you know what has been the most revealing thing about the whole episode? It is the sheer disinterest of the BMJ's readership!

Methinks that there are only three possibilities - either their readership is just totally uninterested in tobacco control or they disagree with tobacco control or the BMJ has little readership.

I wonder to what extent the BMJ is wholly funded offshoot of the British Medical Assn?

Thanks to all for their kind remarks - except that it is the BMJ who deserve the plaudits!""

It is tempting to say, "Enough is enough", but I am not quite sure.

hier

(Anonymous)
Hat jemand ne Meinung wie stark dies verallgemeinerbar ist?

vwjxDd kb bP SAD GiER Cb

(Anonymous)
buy tramadol hcl (http://buytramadolonlinesafe.com/#safety) tramadol withdrawal day 8 - buy tramadol hcl online

  • 1
?

Log in